You are currently browsing the monthly archive for November 2016.
wasn’t goingg to pay attention, but the creativity on Twitter compels me to collect
Todd Dracula takes us to the movies
others, remembered Hole
as others focused more on π
others looked at the (very) big picture
as others looked at the small numbers (46.4% now for π)
Seinfeld Today did their thing
while others made a movie out of it (leaving the Blanche du Bois lighting behind)
and simple is sometimes effective
Someone please help me with the referrence here
disney
and a compilation
000π
Aww! How cute!
and a little truth
per Hanna Arendt, a declaration of intent, not Β a fact
and some get it
and the Simpsons, once again, predicted it
while the media whistles
000π
I have been sensing Β it for some time, but for now, adding to what we know he did in the US, here’s this Β connection
and it’s not like some here didn’t try preventing the takeover
and a bit of levity from Soviet Serghei – but let’s face it, they will be the source of our classified documents now
000π
by contesting his own “win, π becomes the third candidate to contest this election,
perfect headline
and new tweets open it wider still
Tony Scwartz disabuses the notions of planned Β “distraction”
from Carl Bernstein
Snopes tracked down the fake news source for the latest mishugas
and Taibbi concludes
now did we misunderstand?
oh, and here’s π making our argument for us, back in 2012. Talking about Electoral College (thought Obama lost popular vote)
and PR news sums up
000π
Legally, he Β put the legality of this election in dispute. We have 3 candidates who contest the results
Jennifer Granholm agrees
Audit or redo
At first it was a sign that it was a raw nerve
then came the tantrum
which raised the worries
this is a logical conclusion
would electors be swayed?
and while most media simply put the crazy claims in their headlines, People Magazine is the only one getting it right so far
CNN follows
and another one
I agree with Frum, it’s scary
4 Pinocchios from WaPo
000π
Recent Comments