You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘stolen-election’ category.
when do legal consequences kick it?
before that we were told
and this is 🍊’s response – after deleting and editing the original one with typo
this was the original (Quayle – same problem!)
Assange, now revealed as Putin’s xerox boy is protesting by Greenwalding the reporter
they seem to have a camera trained on that floor, like the Intercept when defending Putin/Trump
Trumpies and Bernie bots are advancing this narrative the way Gore was mocked for losing Tennessee (also stolen) in 2000.
So, I’ll start collecting proof that it wasn’t chess they disqualify cheaters in chess)
So, here’s one on MI chess
this is on preemptive disenfranchisement
I noted at the time he opened the door for a recount/redo
His lawyers did to:
but that of course didn’t stop the accusations – having it both way
by contesting his own “win, 🍊 becomes the third candidate to contest this election,
and new tweets open it wider still
Tony Scwartz disabuses the notions of planned “distraction”
from Carl Bernstein
Snopes tracked down the fake news source for the latest mishugas
and Taibbi concludes
now did we misunderstand?
oh, and here’s 🍊 making our argument for us, back in 2012. Talking about Electoral College (thought Obama lost popular vote)
and PR news sums up
Legally, he put the legality of this election in dispute. We have 3 candidates who contest the results
Jennifer Granholm agrees
Audit or redo
At first it was a sign that it was a raw nerve
then came the tantrum
which raised the worries
this is a logical conclusion
would electors be swayed?
and while most media simply put the crazy claims in their headlines, People Magazine is the only one getting it right so far
and another one
I agree with Frum, it’s scary
4 Pinocchios from WaPo