You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Joe’ tag.

Looking good

on page one. And why not? As Palin said: Joe the Plumber won the debates – as he was the only one to get an honest answer out of Obama”

It had to have been this poll

The poll, which found Obama at 44 percent and McCain at 43 percent, supports what some Republicans and Democrats privately have said in recent days: that the race narrowed after the third debate as GOP-leaning voters drifted home to their party and McCain’s “Joe the plumber” analogy struck a chord.

What Obama really meant was

Today Obama told reporters his tax plan doesn’t “spread wealth” but “does involve spreading around opportunity.”

“That does mean people like myself making more than $250,000 pay a little bit more,” he said.

RNC responded

“Obama believes that raising taxes to ‘spread the wealth’ will create ‘opportunity.’ If Obama does not prescribe to socialism, then what economic theory does he follow? Obama apparently believes government creates jobs, which is why he wants to raise taxes on hard-working Joes.”

My question is: what about all the sycophants telling us “spreading the wealth” was a good thing? out of luck I guess. And does Joe the Plumber get his job back now? His reputation? or he still has to pay for …Misunderstanding”?

Those of you who missed, forgot the rules of W.O.R.M. – your chance to catch up

America’s fastest-growing quiz sensation is “What Obama Really Meant.” Here’s how W.O.R.M. is played…

So, who are you gonna believe, Obama or your lying eyes?

True Obama mocked Joe

and basically said he didn’t exist (just like us, PUMAs)

But he tells you now, this never happened. So, you better forget it and give him the voters he is entitled to, you racist rdnecks.


I wonder if he also made a mistake in 2001 when he talked about redistribution of wealth as the unrealized civil right

So, the question is now, which time didn’t you mean “spreading around wealth”? When talking to joe or back in 2001?

Not Your Sweetie

January 2020
« Dec