You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘cult’ tag.

Click here to add text
Click here to add text

I was away from the Father’s Day mediagasm – busy as I was celebrating Summer Solstice and helping my kid with her Father Day offerings.

So, when the smoke cleared, all I saw was this amazing leftover in SF Gate

n this Father’s Day, the American public should proudly note that our president takes his personal role as father (and spouse) as seriously as he does his job as father of the country.

Oh, I didn’t forget how Rove & gang used to tell us about W knowing better than us what we need and W that he doesn’t need to explain his decisions. The Patriarchy was quite explicit then too.

But at least in the media – supine as it was – we didn’t get W’s slogans as headlines

Obama’s example: Putting family first

Nor did we get told that W – or anyone else since Washington – was Father of the Country…

The outright piece of propaganda lists point by point the amazing exemplary things Obama does as a father then sticking its finger in our eye

Come next Father’s Day, our banking crisis might not be wholly resolved, the auto industry might not be on its feet again, and health care coverage might not be fully available to the uninsured. But we can only hope that fathers and spouses everywhere will be thinking “What Would Obama Do?” as they navigate through the murky waters of parenthood and family life.

Hey, propaganda lady – if those economic crisis will not be solved by next father day, how will all those lecture fathers put food on their families – as W would say?

But the father propaganda is important to Daddy Issues Obama – so Axelrod muscled out another editorial from Parade Magazine to share his letter to his daughters with the masses. Because children always love being on display! It usually invites kindness from people like Letterman and Maher but not when your daddy swats flies like the destiny itself

Click here to add text
Click here to add text

At least so would this Huffpo headline have you believe

Obama Could Be Handed First Legislative Defeat Due To Anti-War Liberals

Is HuffPo – the unfiltered propaganda arm of the regime trying to rise sympathy for Obama here?

Or rather, put a positive spin on an eventual setback?

At issue is the war spending bill, which per Reuters grows fatter by the minute

A $100 billion bill to fund U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is rapidly accumulating extra items such as money for military aircraft the Pentagon doesn’t want and possibly a scheme to jump-start sagging auto sales.

not counting for the torture photos cover-up language,and don’t even think it all came out from Congress

President Barack Obama originally sought $83.4 billion for the two wars and more foreign aid for countries like Pakistan.

But then he too sought more — $4 billion extra to combat H1N1 swine flu and $5 billion to back credit lines to the International Monetary Fund,

Now, all that pork earned it political foes and Huffpo, the White House bullhorn explains:

The emergence of opposition from left and right to the expanded legislation has inspired anti-war forces to try to hand Obama his first major defeat.

Oh, the humanity! What will Obama do? What will the big bad liberals do to him? Stay tuned.

It’s all a matter of “politics making strange bed fellows” according to Huffpo

In one of the ironies of the legislative process, the threat of Republicans to vote en masse against the measure has empowered the liberal wing of the House Democratic caucus, giving it potential veto power over the legislation.

So, let’s get this straight: anti-war  legislators feel empowered by GOP opposition – and they’ll use this power to defeat Obama’s bill. Right? Not so fast, because here comes the crucial buried lede

Other anti-war advocates in Congress privately warn that they are likely to be outmaneuvered, and that many in their ranks are not willing to deal Obama a major legislative defeat.

I mean, simple choice really – no matter how complicated the article makes it appear:

War  or Teh One – which is going to be?

Being Huffpo, the lie that Obama wanted to close Gitmo, Guntanamo but Congress stopped him is repeated here again. I suppose after Lieberman’s fight against the torture photos, they’ll newspeak the past and tell us “Obama always wanted to publish those photos, but Congress wouldn’t let him.”

Propaganda aside, this is the big story

Anti-war advocates are not willing to deal Obama a major legislative defeat

Like the rest of the B0bots, not in congress, they are willing to go against their utmost beliefs because every time Obama gets defeated a kitten cries…

Better let people die in “stupid wars”(as Teh One said in Teh Speech) than damage the aura of invincibility

After all, Nicholas Kristoff at Obama’s other propaganda arm explained to us that liberals can live with everything these days, only yucky conservatives get disgusted by stuff

So, go ahead, call your congressman – see if he’s a liberal or a conservative. But better don’t call. You don’t want a kitten to cry, do you?

Click here to add text
Click here to add text

cute-kitten-crying.jpg image by cari

Or, if like me are not into cute, how about a Monthy Python scene to illustrate this, with the Black Night as the Bobots:

ARTHUR:  Look, you stupid bastard, you've got no arms left.
  BLACK KNIGHT:  Yes I have.
  ARTHUR:  Look!
  BLACK KNIGHT:  Just a flesh wound.
  ARTHUR:  Look, stop that.
  BLACK KNIGHT:  Chicken!  Chicken!
  ARTHUR:  Look, I'll have your leg.  Right!
  BLACK KNIGHT:  Right, I'll do you for that!
  ARTHUR:  You'll what?
  BLACK KNIGHT:  Come 'ere!
  ARTHUR:  What are you going to do, bleed on me?

Click here to add text
Click here to add text

Might give a whole new meaning to “bleeding heart…

We have the trip to Paris, where people see God (at least in the AP version)

“I saw God before me,” he said, “because I saw this smile that a million people have seen around the world. I saw her (Michelle) radiant. … It’s idiotic, but it’s like that.”

Well, at least the man called it for what it was, as the French don’t see God that often.

In the AFP version, a waiter at the same restaurant informs us “God” is a bit paranoid

They have someone who tastes the dishes,” said waiter Gabriel de Carvalho from the “La Fontaine de Mars” restaurant where Obama and his family turned up for dinner on Saturday night.

“It wasn’t very pleasant for the cooks at first, but the person was very nice and was relaxed, so it all went well,” he said on the Itele news channel.

How very Roman emperor of him!

Ap also found someone who made the unfavorable Clinton comparison

Obama shook the men’s hands, then posed for a group photo.”It’s fantastic. What a beautiful souvenir!” exclaimed a beaming Daldoss.

He said he has worked in motorcades for Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush without ever getting such hands-on gratitude.

“The others were nice but not more than that,” Daldoss said. “I retire in a few months. This is a magnificent mission.”

and rushed to publish it in the “common touch” suck up department, in spite stories like this one abunding about Clinton.

Click here to add text
Click here to add text

On a more serious matter, the official propaganda paper, NYT has a deceptively interesting title on an article where “brilliant” is repeated every paragraph – mostly about Larry Summers – and besids the opening news that Obama swatted a fly, the only news for me was that Obama was keeping Bush’s chief of Federal reserve (in the interests of financial stability” – what stability?).

To get the real news I had to get to Voice of America (just like when I was in the old country) to find out that

The somber admission follows the latest jobless report showing the highest unemployment rate the United States has seen in more than 25 years.

U.S. unemployment jumped a half percent in May, to 9.4 percent

Seems those brilliant men in the fly swatting NY Time s piece were a bit wrong

a member of President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors:

“The economy clearly has gotten substantially worse from the initial predictions that were being made, not just by the White House, but by all of the private sector,” said Austan Goolsbe

That can’t be true! New York Times tells us

With those,(brilliant efforts)  and the Fed’s efforts, the economy shows signs of new life.

I guess coma patients show those too…

And that was


You asked for it? In tune with the new fall line of faith merchandise products

You got it! Ecce Homo

What I want to know is – who are the thorns? Women? Voters? Democracy? Working class? Old people?

For a pampered man who got everything handled to him on a silver platter and took advantage of other people’s suffering, making a career of it, this one is proof that irony is dead.

Those stubborn people who stuck by W no matter how outrageous his actions? FISA, torture, nothing fazed them off. We used to joke that if the news would come that Bush ate babies they’d ask “with what sauce?”

meet the new brand: the Oborg.(courtesy of campskunk’s comment at the Confluence) According to the new Fox poll

68 percent of Obama’s supporters would still support him if he switched  to pro-life.

58 percent would still support him if he appointed judges like Scalia.

(which tells you the hypocrisy of the Roe stick they keep beating us with)

41% would still support him if he started a war with Iran.

let me repeat that:

41% would still support him if he started a war with Iran.

So, eating babies – not even that newsworthy. Although I wish now they did ask.

Not Your Sweetie

December 2019
« Nov