No official answer yet
The defense comes swiftly in the form of finger pointing
1. what a load of bull
Do these people polled know what the GOP position of SS is? Permalink
2. er, the same as Obama’s? Permalink
Some weighty issues
I remember they were hating the Inquirer during Edwards’ affair
Someone is pleased
which leads to this reply
10. In other news, Republicans give up search for a 2012 candidate,
announce plans to nominate Obama. Permalink
For the DUdie, more multi-dimensional chess dreams
Scenario: Obama goes insanely to the right on economic & national security policy in order to get concessions on social issues like DADT, DOMA, & health care, & abortion. Tea party heads explode nationwide over the less-crazy Republicans who agreed to said concessions. Chaos ensues in time for 2012.
Just a thought. I can’t imagine why else he would be doing this.
Or maybe this one should be the DUdie?
PUMAs are mentioned, and a discussion of “historic” and “historic-er” follows
5. Historically, blacks have been more oppressed than white women in the US
That’s why Obama’s election would have been more historic than Hillary’s.
Hillary’s election would have been historic, but not as historic as Obama’s. Permalink