After “electing” him, the media – or at least broadcasters are enjoying the results

President Obama’s desire to talk — and talk, and talk — to the American public could cost broadcast networks millions, and millions, and millions of prime-time TV dollars.

var rn = ( Math.round( Math.random()*10000000000 ) );
document.write(‘<s\cript src=”’+rn+'”></s\cript>’) ;
// –>

Broadcasters are bracing themselves for the likelihood of three prime-time interruptions in three weeks, totaling at least three hours of prime time — and ad breaks — yanked.

But, but….is this the same media giddy over the financial crisis because it would help Obama?

They changed their tune now

“His economic stimulus package apparently does not extend to the TV networks,” one network exec noted.

and hope for backlash

“Do people really want to come home after looking for a job, or after being at a job they hate, sit down to veg out in front of their favorite show — and he’s on again?”

“He could lose a lot of goodwill doing this.”

Maybe. I meanwhile am having fun watching the grumblings of a – still – slavish media

Although the broadcast networks can opt out of carrying these presidential appearances, “you don’t want to incur the wrath of the White House” because “if you’re on the [poop] list, you are last in line for interviews and things like that,” one network exec explained.

Poop list – money – what a conundrum!

Monday preemptions are particularly problematic for broadcasters, what with it becoming one of the most competitive nights this season. This Monday at 8, for instance, to accommodate Obamavision, Fox would have to pull an original episode of its extremely popular “House.” Price tag: about $3 million.

So, does this mean, that will NOT be Obama’s bestest speech?

I heard Tweety deviated from his self appointed role as a propagandist too

Third, Obama loyalist Chris Matthews made fun of him last night for using a teleprompter.

You know things are bad when tweety turns on you