The Obama media reaches for the obvious and calls the damage control they are doing for Obama just that: “Damage Control” – a somewhat damning headline for their protege. Although they still try to present the whole unpleasantness as “a test of openness” for Obama

Obama’s campaign lawyer Bob Bauer is taking a leading role in conducting what one top aide described as “an internal review” stopping short of a full-blown investigation.

The goal is simple and urgent: find who talked with disgraced Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich and when – and precisely what they said.

When you’re talking “lawyer” and “what they said” – it’s more than a test.

Maybe those multiple conversations will Rahm Emmanuel over the senate seat will come out to light as they are on wiretapes anyway

Maybe that’s why the word “scandal” is also used now

In trying to meet the first rule of Washington scandal-management – get the facts out on your own terms, and fast – Obama may have promised something he’ll later regret, one expert warned.

And the other possibility of nuggets of information

Obama also released the list of donors to his transition fund earlier than required. And this week, he announced his transition team would take questions from the public and answer the most popular queries.

hey, who knows? With all this “openness” one of these days, the electoral campaign list of donors may be released too…

One more stumbling block to getting the facts on his own terms: Rezko is talking

Of course, NY Times goes out of its make every paragraph exculpatory

“When Tony Rezko was charged with all these crimes, people speculated about what he might say about Obama,” Mr. Stewart said. “But as of now, nothing of any consequence has come out of that.”

It’s good they use qualifiers such as “as of now” considering Rezko may be talking some more

So, while B0bots feel that the media terrorizes Obama, I am starting to wonder, how long can they manage to portray Obama as heroic and noble in the avalanche of new facts?