We know this is hardly a first –Β  The RBC meeting, later the Unity NH travesty told us the same story…

In the growing saga of “ways Obama is just like Bush” – a new chapter:

Stundents wonder

Why is the University of Mary Washington inhibiting free speech at today’s Obama-Biden rally?

Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee for president, is scheduled to speak at a rally at the university today. The public is invited to this forum, on property it, the public, owns. However, signs and banners will not be allowed, according to the organizers and compliant campus officials. Suddenly, UMW is a First Amendment-Free, or at least a First Amendment-Crippled, Zone, subject to the self-serving preferences of politicos. Why does an Obama rally–or a McCain rally or a Nader rally–justify taking a little off the top of Americans’ most fundamental rights?

At least Bush waited to be installed in the White House before he started creating a bubble.

And in another startling similarity; security is cited as a reason

A UMW spokeswoman says that the Obama campaign required the sign-and-banner ban. That campaign tells us that the ban is for “security” reasons. But a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service, responsible for protecting presidential candidates, says that the service has no objection to signs at rallies, provided that no “part of the sign could be used as a weapon”–e.g., a heavy metal pole or a sharpened stick. Finally, the McCain campaign tells us, “We encourage people to make signs at our events.”

I suppose being a Constitutional Law Professor means never to have to say “I am sorry”