You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘misogyny’ category.

I once thought of naming my dog MoDo because she hates all girl dogs while getting along fine with the guys. I didn’t, because I like my dog.

MoDo is still lying, of course, but she is trying to make herself look better NOT BY ATTACKING HILLARY?

NY Times’ Dowd Tries To Whitewash Her Awful Hillary Campaign Coverage

It’s a good article, so I won’t add anything to it except “what happened??????”

and not afraid to say so

The Daily News fresh from their Obamagasm, shows their true co;ors by displaying the same picture

I did not watch this non-event, but got a better perspective from this source

I guess this would show the same moment that NYC tabloids relished from a better angle and you’ll have to go to the source for their  priceless narrative

On edit, the Gothamist has a good comment

A One Act Play About The NY Post’s Sexist Hillary Clinton Cover

..Excerpt

Post Editor Guy 1: So are we goin’ with “HELLARY: WHO’D WANT TO BENGHAZI THIS BROAD?!” or “MIDDLE SHEESH! WACKO WOMAN GETS SNIPPY AT SENATE” ?

Post Editor Guy 2: Hmmm, whaddya think Gary?

Post Editor Guy 3: [Brushing 7-11 Taquito crumbs off double chin]

Not much I can add to this…

Told'ja So, the truth comes out about what it’s like to work as a woman in the White House. In Ron Susskind’s new upcoming book, Confidence Men, Women in Obama’s White House felt excluded and ignored: A new book claims that the Obama White House is a boys’ club marred by rampant infighting that has hindered the administration’s economic policy and left top female advisers feeling excluded from key conversations. “Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington, … Read More

via The Confluence

After being tried in the media, the verdict came early:

 

it’s OK to beat and rape a woman.

 

Even while being French.

And Bloomberg wants to control our lives even more

 

,

My morning sneeze comes from Roger Ebert’s tweet. He tweets often, on many subjects, relevant and funny.

On this one I am afraid he put the emphasis on the wrong thing though

He should have said : “He said “women”

The article at the link sets it straight from the headline

Female sex workers can use condoms too, says Pope

This is a clarification of prior “game changing” statements

Pope Benedict XVI was quoted at the weekend saying condom use by male prostitutes could be a good thing, indicating the user’s intention to protect others from a deadly infection, apparently condoning the use of contraceptives for the first time. The Vatican yesterday confirmed that the same message applied to women sex workers.

In other words, when sticking his nose in other people’s bedrooms (or cars, or dark  street corners), the Pope decided preventing disease is an acceptable reason for condom use.

But only if sex is traded for money, mind you.

I think some of his advisers since the original statement informed him shockingly, not only some priests go for adult males, but for some, women are of interest as well.

And, voila! Women are allowed to not get sick too!

Another giant step for women! (provided they sell it, mind you). They can now sell sex just like the guys!

MSLeader

Jane Crow

Don't be bitter, OK?

Not Your Sweetie

October 2014
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers