There is a reason I put as the logo of this blog something Pete Seeger once said: “If you can’t change the world, don’t let the world change you”
I only got aware of social movements, politics in the fall of 2000 as I watched on CNN how chad by chad an election was being stolen right under my eyes. I had had the vague feeling something was wrong during the Clintons witch hunt, but now it was all so painfully clear for me to see, I couldn’t ignore it.
A lot of other people got activated by that outrage. protests, on line movements were born – and I was there for it. I told myself – well, if the political power was stolen away from us, at least we are organizing – people of like mind and we will get the change we seek.
During the Bush reign, organize we did. We mounted an opposition to war, created our own reality based media on line – it seemed like the power was ours to get.
Of course, Wall Street started grooming a tool which they presented to these brothers in arms of mine: look! He has black skin – therefore ignore his record, he must be your way to power.
Most of my brothers in arms fell for it. They took the bait, hook line and sinker and thrown their precious fight behind the corporate man.
I was left with only a few – less easily duped friends who saw through the ruse. Eventually Wall Street maintained and consolidated its power with the new tools, breaking the Democratic party in the process. No longer could the Ds say “Rs steal elections” They had now done it to their own members. For money. So, most of us left the party and for a while we were known as PUMA as we wouldn’t come around to embrace the corporate man.
After the coup was accomplished some of my fewer friends went to the right. I found myself at a PUMA party Β where my kid was asked “So what are they teaching you in that public school?”
That’s when I shed the name – which was obsolete after the elections anyway. But still had many of my friends who thought like me (I thought)
Recently, OWS came as a new reality test. In the beginning we were all cautious – are these people the same ones responsible for Obama shilling for the Wall Street? Turned out, not exactly. The originators were an international group that predate Obama. The objective was not to help campaign 2012 but in fact, beyond politics, about economic justice.
But by then it was too late for my suspicious friends. From “maybe they are Obots” it evolved to “jobless, smelly hippies” and somehow they summoned all the hatred of the right festering since the 60s against those rising for social justice. (“hippies do nothing but make you feel bad about yourself – one wingnut tellingly explained).
From here, it wasn’t much keeping score and cheering every time a police baton cracked a “smelly hippie” skull. All the way to fascism – and once again – right under my eyes.
It hurts even more this time as I watched the transformation even closer than I did in 2008. people I considered my friends are now cheering the police state (Obama’s police state, ironically).
I wrote this to say: THERE IS NO EXCUSE.
I don’t care how disappointed you wee that fellow progressive brought on such a scourge as Obama.
I don’t care how pissed you are that they called you racist, old, uneducated while they were doing so.
I don’t care how angry you are that they stole your voting rights.
I don’t care how enraged you are to see them sitting silent while Obama starts new wars and ends more civil rights.
I don’t ultimately care if these (OWS) are the same people or new, more radical people.
I don’t know where it will end, whether it will succeed or it will be co-opted by some politicians like the Tea party was. It’s about the issues at hand.
What is happening now is big and just and important. You can stand for justice or cheer for the oppressors. No middle road on this.
Back to Pete Seeger’s words: in 2008 I found myself – once again – powerless to change the world. But at least I didn’t let the world change me. I am not giving away my ideals just because some holding them were duped/bought/perverted. Nor am I compromising them to be able to still hang with some old friends – sad Β that the loss makes me.
20 comments
November 4, 2011 at 2:12 pm
T
Good post.
November 4, 2011 at 4:02 pm
Riverdaughter
Yep, I’m surprised too at the reaction of some former friends to OWS. I think we have to consider the possibility that they never were who we thought they were. And their presence among us was not necessarily sympathetic. It was business.
November 4, 2011 at 4:10 pm
ralphb
One thing is certain, a clear bright line has been drawn now and I know which side I’m on for the long run.
November 4, 2011 at 5:32 pm
prowlerzee
Standing ovation, NYS! Brava…and thank you. There is work being done and more work to do, so I dropped those too easily influenced by rightwing memes. No time to school them, they’ll just have to watch history pass them by and eat their hearts out that *they* weren’t the instrument of change.
The dirty, smelly, “overweight” (troll comment completely accepted by PUMAs who consider themselves too “feminist” for OWS) hippies managed to move 4 and a half BILLION dollars out of the big banks….and at least 80,000 more are pledged to move their money tomorrow. So much for the meme that they need to “focus.”
I opened my new local bank account today and tell Citizens tomorrow that their fee-gouging is a thing of my past.
November 4, 2011 at 5:38 pm
ncpuma
I have been shocked by the response of some. OWS seems clear to me. I think this is the revolution we have been waiting for. Something has to change because we can not keep going like this.
November 6, 2011 at 8:28 am
teresainpa
I have very mixed feelings about OWS. I have been predicting some sort of revolution for 30 years and am not convince this is it or that this will come out the way I would like it too. However I am not closed minded about it.
I know exactly what you are talking about. It is rather disturbing to watch. Truth is that if you are “around” people long enough on the internet you realize that you agree sometimes, you disagree sometimes and for reasons you never could have guessed. Imagine my surprise when I realized there were Hillary supporters who have recently exposed themselves as anti-science. Politics make strange bedfellows….and transient ones also. Try not to take it personally. I think most of us have gotten annoyed and said or done things we wish we could take back.
November 6, 2011 at 8:56 am
Not Your Sweetie
I have seen Hillbuzz posting on Facebook about some OWS-ers daring to disturb a Reagan Library event! St Reagan, I tells ya! Me, I thought we opposed Obama because he was a Reagan fan… That was the end of my friendship with HillBuz.
Mind you, it’s not questioning, doubting OWS that bothers me – I was skeptical myself when it started and I still don’t know how will it evolve.
It’s opposing it from an authoritarian, fascistic position that drives me insane. THAT shows a lurch all the way to the right – in the wingnut territory.
November 6, 2011 at 3:15 pm
Alessandro Machi
Hillary Clinton had such a diverse following that people who supported her felt they had to move on because of the democratic injustice her own party wrought against her in 2007 and 2008.
The result is some Hillary Clinton fans became Sarah Palin fans, others became Tea Party fans, others went back to the republican party, still others went back to being democratic progressive, and others just went back to being democrats.
Those who were for the Tea Party have been led to believe they should be against the Occupy Movement. This is probably a mistake. I believe the Tea Party Movement, before the Republican Party moved in to Occupy it, was against Barack Obama’s one trick pony of raising taxes so he could buy votes. Whether it was raising taxes so he could dole out more money, or come up with screwy ways to put people in more debt by loaning them money they probably could not pay back, the Tea Party originally was just calling shenanigans in regards to Barack Obama the flim flam man, and rightly so.
There are portions of the Occupy Movement that are in direct contradiction to the Tea Party, but there are other components that both the Tea Party and the Occupy Movement are in agreement.
I feel changing the banking law in which restructuring a debt requires putting the debtor into default first is the one banking law, that if changed to “restructuring a debt DOES NOT first require a default”, would give main street and the 99% their power back.
November 6, 2011 at 7:19 pm
Not Your Sweetie
Good point. In its very beginning, the tea party was a populist movement against the abuses of the 1% (except they see the government as the big bad, while we see it as a tool for the 1%).
Anyway, one of their major objections – why don’t they Occupy The White House has been answered today
http://www.livestream.com/tarsandsaction
November 7, 2011 at 8:24 am
prowlerzee
Oh, don’t worry….no matter how many actions happen in DC, they will still drag that old “objection” up.
November 7, 2011 at 12:47 pm
Anthony
RE: OCCUPY D.C.-
There is a HUGE difference between occupying the White House and holding people hostage in a convention center
PLEASE NOTE: YOU GOT THE ADDRESS WRONG
In an effort to show my support, I’m giving you the following information with hope it might be helpful in the future.
Please write it down.
The White House
1700 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington DC
November 7, 2011 at 1:09 pm
Anthony
Still confused?
Now, turn around and look to your left. Pitch your tent on that big lawn, and wait for someone to come and talk to you
November 7, 2011 at 2:17 pm
ralphb
NYS wasn’t talking about the Kochsucker’s event. Try paying attention for a change.
November 7, 2011 at 3:01 pm
Anthony
I gave you directions. Now go.
November 7, 2011 at 4:00 pm
ralphb
FOAD!
November 9, 2011 at 8:53 am
Not Your Sweetie
@WTF are you to tell people where to go? Fight your own damn battles, whatever they are.
November 9, 2011 at 9:40 am
Anthony
Oh, now you’re “censoring”…….
November 9, 2011 at 11:48 am
prowlerzee
Oh, Anthony…you still haven’t “mea culpa” apologized for getting the events mixed up. Was that on purpose? You’re purposely pretending no one’s been protesting outside the White House? Thanks for proving me right. Just as I said 4 hours before you waltzed in and gave a prime example…no matter how many times they DO protest at 1700 Pennsylvania Ave you trolls will pretend it didn’t happen.
November 9, 2011 at 11:51 am
Anthony
I responded to a comment above mine (read them all before you cast stones)
And you should really think a little harder about pointing fingers when your own hand is dirty.
You have the directions too, so go there and let me know when you’ve put your money where your mouth is
Have fun!!
November 10, 2011 at 12:42 pm
ralphb
Directions for you. Go to hell, shit for brains!