Sometimes I see a post that sums up everything I have been saying (for a few yeats now)
In a thread about Krugman’s latest.
KRUGMAN: Obama/Conceder In Chief — What evidence do we have that Obama knows what he’s doing?
someone writes
52. it’s almost like a man elected by chanting, ecstatic, weeping masses who screamed themselves horse
and whose (dwindling) followers say he should be praised for doing the opposite of what he actually IS doing, and that he can do no wrong, and that literally NOTHING he could do would make them vote against him,can feel like he can do anything without consequence…
Alert
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
v
Advertisement


3 comments
July 23, 2011 at 8:52 am
DeniseVB
Yay, Dudies are back
I liked this comment, wonder how long it will stay up? Many comments have been removed so far……
“In the last presidential primaries I watched
many hounded or booted out of this place for saying the exact same thing.
They were called, which was allowed to stand, “PUMAS” and “racists”
I haven’t noted any tombstones lately, but the accusations are still being made and are still allowed to stand.
Be careful…”
July 23, 2011 at 2:39 pm
Not Your Sweetie
I noticed that the entire thread is hidden from the “greatest” in spite of its 175 recs this morning. It just doesn’t show up – unless you follow my link.
Also, the operatives are there in force.
July 25, 2011 at 2:41 pm
Buttered
RE: “52. it’s almost like a man elected by chanting, ecstatic, weeping masses who screamed themselves horse
and whose (dwindling) followers say he should be praised for doing the opposite of what he actually IS doing, and that he can do no wrong, and that literally NOTHING he could do would make them vote against him…”
Er…. Don’t they call that the “Stockholm Syndrome?” You remember. The fact that after a while hi-jacked passengers or kidnapped victims start to feel sorry for their criminal kidnappers?