important question
Will We Still Be Allowed To Post Here If We Support Democrats, But Not the President ???
No official answer yet
Oops!
Oops… ‘Obama’s Social Security Talk Is Turning Voters Off, Pollsters Say’ – Dan Froomkin/HuffPo
The defense comes swiftly in the form of finger pointing
1. what a load of bull
answered
2. er, the same as Obama’s? Permalink
Some weighty issues
Did Todd Palin Have an Affair with a Massage Therapist?
I remember they were hating the Inquirer during Edwards’ affair
Someone is pleased
Congressional Republicans praise President Obama for reviewing government business regulations
which leads to this reply
10. In other news, Republicans give up search for a 2012 candidate,
For the DUdie, more multi-dimensional chess dreams
What if Obama’s pro-business agreements are calculated to further divide the Republican Party?
Scenario: Obama goes insanely to the right on economic & national security policy in order to get concessions on social issues like DADT, DOMA, & health care, & abortion. Tea party heads explode nationwide over the less-crazy Republicans who agreed to said concessions. Chaos ensues in time for 2012.
Just a thought. I can’t imagine why else he would be doing this.
Or maybe this one should be the DUdie?
 |
Please tell me I did not just see a Hillary 2012 ad on CNN
PUMAs are mentioned, and a discussion of “historic” and “historic-er” follows
A sample:
5. Historically, blacks have been more oppressed than white women in the US
Hillary’s election would have been historic, but not as historic as Obama’s. Permalink
.
6 comments
January 21, 2011 at 12:22 pm
Tweets that mention DUdies for Jan 14-19 Obama is more”historicaler” « Not Your Sweetie -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Edge Oforever, Notyoursweetie blog. Notyoursweetie blog said: The "Obama is more historicaler" edition of the DUdies http://wp.me/p38IU-4os [...]
January 21, 2011 at 12:51 pm
Zee
omg. Vomit. More vomit than a barf bag could hold.
I am so sick of the white woman bashing. My ASS it would’ve been less historical.
It’s just that the media immediately dropped the talking point that Hillary’s election would be historic. And these Obot morons talk about Faux-News viewers.
January 21, 2011 at 3:20 pm
Michelina
I don’t know what world and History these Obies are talking about,
but this has to be the Worst information out of their mouths since this whold crap started> AA’s more oppressed then women!!
Something is very very very wrong with all of this——
Half of the AA’s if not more, are WOMEN you asshats—-
January 21, 2011 at 7:21 pm
Buttered
Edge, as always, thank you again for your tireless effort in rounding up front pages and going where no woman, or man should have to go ……
Your post sure as the correct title for the Demo Lunacy ensuing.
“historic, but not as historic” – I was not aware that “historic” more “historicer” or most “historicest” could be measured like weighing so many pounds of pinto beans…….
January 21, 2011 at 10:47 pm
dwp
What a bunch of “morans” these shmucks are.
Some oneneeds to tell them that there have been FIVE bi-racial Presidents of the US.
Someone needs to tell them black MALES got the right to vote long before women did.
Someone needs to tell them that the period of slavery lasted only 75years.
Someone needs to let these dillweeds know that the equal rights amendment has not passed yet.
And someone needs to tell these fuckers that there is nothing on the US Contitution that protects women from discrimination.
And some one needs to let the inserting know that there has NEVER been a woman US President.
Lastly, someone needs to tell these dipshits to sit down and shut the fuck up until they know what they are talking about. Damn lackwits.
January 22, 2011 at 7:08 am
Not Your Sweetie
A few of those thruths were actually posted in the thread by someone…cool.