
Right after the revelations about the media conspiracy to install Obama using Jurnolist, Sullivan is patting himself on the back for not being on that list
One reason I would never be on such a list, of course, is my record of non-liberalism: my loathing of the Clintons, my anti-p.c. instincts, my disdain for taboos on race and gender and sexuality on the left, my early support for what I stupidly thought would be moderate conservatism under Bush and even dumber tub-thumping for war in Iraq after the trauma of 9/11.
Let’s see if I get this: I was never part of a group whose reason to exist was to attack Hillary Clinton on daily basis because….I hate the Clintons too much.
And it gets better
I was also shocked by George Stephanopoulos’ FNC-style questioning in the primary debate, and said so in no uncertain terms. But those errors and good judgments were mine and mine alone.
This disclaimer comes after the article on Jurnoist reveals that
Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged. “George [Stephanopoulos],” fumed Richard Kim of the Nation, is “being a disgusting little rat snake.”
and actively worked to attack ABC and its ancors for daring to ask Obama questions.
So, what are Sully’s errors again? (besides his love of W):
Thathe hated the Clintons BEFORE some of the Jurnoists people (Conason, Tomasky, feel humbled) and he hated ABC’s anchors for not giving Obama his fluffy pillows even more.
If that is a crime, flay me with a wet noodle. Please!
In all fairness, he also has a good last sentence
But socialized groupthink is not the answer to what’s wrong with the media. It’s what’s already wrong with the media.
Too bad that everything he wrote before was explaining why he was even more group thinky than most. His whole argument amounts to
I was Jurnoist before there was a jurnoist
And he is right


7 comments
July 21, 2010 at 6:15 am
strayyellardawg
I have always liked Stephanopoulis. And I still do. And…. this gives me even more reason to disdain the coup that is Obama.
July 21, 2010 at 6:36 am
edgeoforever
Actually, I saw Snuffi as a backstabber to the Clintons – it’s how he got his media job. But he was good on that debate.
July 21, 2010 at 11:14 am
hennie1
He’s such a friggen jerk, no one wanted him. We all knew someone was controlling the media, it just wasn’t him.
July 21, 2010 at 11:29 am
cj
Nasty bit of RW excrement, it’s no surprise he fell head-over-heels for the O. Did anyone even ask him to join?
Every thug on that g*ddamned list should be exposed & blackballed, but other than FOX, not a peep out of MSM. Just once, JUST ONCE in my life, I’d like to find myself on the right side of media bias. All those fluffed-up pillows over there must feel nice.
July 21, 2010 at 1:52 pm
edgeoforever
Two names that disappointed me: Tomaski and especially Conason. I’ll be making a list and checking it twice.
In fact, I’ll probably start an ongoing entry and update it as names trickle in the news – whether I know them or not.
July 21, 2010 at 2:02 pm
cj
I know. He did such a great expose of the RW assault on Clinton…big disappointment to see his name.
A list is a fantastic idea. At some point, I expect to see Tweety and Olbermann, Roland Martin, Russert, etc. pop up, not on the list, but as contacts.
I’ve been trying to piece together a time frame of the BOT attacks after April, to see what lines up with what the ‘journo’ plotters.
July 21, 2010 at 2:04 pm
cj
^ [with what the journo' thugs were plotting]