That’s what a feminist looks like!
Update In 2011 the conscience rule has been slightly revised to only permit bigots to deny terminations of pregnancy, not treatment for AIDS HIV and contraceptive as well. Somehow, the women are still paying for bigotry of others.
As seen in today’s tabloids entry, Rahm already dictated WaPo about the EO which means that the deal was already in place ad the EO already written when the “cliffhanger” appeared to take place. It was all choreographed, Stupak was to hold on to the very end so as to justify the goody he was about to receive,
Obama issued an EO henceforth known as the Jane Crow EO that does far more than repeat the Hyde amendment as propaganda would have you believe
Also, I’d like to stress the point from the NOW resolution about Hyde being the so called law of he land
Contrary to language in the draft of the executive order and repeated assertions in the news, the Hyde Amendment is not settled law — it is an illegitimate tack-on to an annual must-pass appropriations bill.
Obama’s EO treats it as law and then it re-states W’s conscience rules (where doctors can refuse care if they are RW) and protects THEM from discrimination while discriminating against women
The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly-created health insurance exchanges. Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, Pub. L. No. 111-8, §508(d)(1) (2009)) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.
New protections= beyond W’s Hyde’s Stupak, OK?
When W left the “conscience rule” behind him, at the end of 2008, Obama refused to comment on it
Later, in that best heckled HCR speech, Obama made sure to promise that the conscience rule will stay
And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up – under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place.”
So, the deal with Stupak was in place from the get go – it was just a “don’t throw me in the briar patch” little game they played on women.
If Stupak didn’t exist, they would have had to invent him. Just like Lieberman on the Public Option.
Just so Planned Parenthood can say they were sorry Obama was forced to issue such an EO.
“We regret that a pro-choice president of a pro-choice nation was forced to sign an Executive Order that further codifies the proposed anti-choice language in the health care reform bill, originally proposed by Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska.
Oh, and you have to love how often the word “segregation” is used
I hereby direct the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS to develop, within 180 days of the date of this Executive Order, a model set of segregation guidelines for state health insurance commissioners to use when determining whether exchange plans are complying with the Act’s segregation requirements,
Here’s a B0bot on it
7. Trying to wrap my brain around Obama, our nation’s first black president
writing an Executive Order basically “segregating” and codifying inequality for half the population of the US.
Do I have this right?
And what does that say about how low this President would stoop to get this bill?
And on B0botland I also found this comment:
25. What the hell did they expect? Obama is MALE.
No man is going to protect the rights of women as they do the rights of men. EVER. And any woman who voted for BO instead of Hillary should have known better. I’m beyond the abortion age and having to worry about it, but for all the 20-30-40-something females who didn’t vote for Hillary, you’re about to get another lesson on how NOT to vote (how many lessons do you need? another 60 years worth?). Women have had to fight for every freakin’ right we have and it was never handed over graciously by any man…trust me. If women don’t stick together, things will never change and the MEN WILL continue to negotiate what we can and can’t do with our bodies. Do any of you actually believe Hillary Clinton would have done this? Hell NO she wouldn’t have.But you all have HOPE, right? I guess this is that “Change” you were all promised. I hope you’re all happy.
Oh, why wouldn’t they be happy? here’s what Mr change gave them
“While the legislation as written maintains current law, the executive order provides additional safeguards to ensure that the status quo is upheld and enforced and that the health care legislation’s restrictions against the public funding of abortions cannot be circumvented,” the White House statement said.
And they ARE happy. This was written as the EO was announced
An executive order would be a win-win…
Per MSNBC-The executive order will explicitly say that the health care bills passed by the house and senate would adhere to the Hyde amendment which says no federal funding would go towards abortion.
Lynn Woolsey and her pro-choice colleagues approve of this potential executive order and think it’s a GOOD thing as do all the other Dem. congressmen speaking on MSNBC. So we’d get MORE than enough votes for this bill AND we’d have language re: abortion that some think is less restrictive than the current Nelson amendment.
Hooray! We made out like bandits!
Oh, and to those of you who decided to take it on Stupak – it;s a waste of time. Like Lieberman who was villain of the week last December, cleansing the bill of PO as Obama had promised his handlers, so did Stupak did his bidding yesterday.
Obama got to play defense while delivering a long desired payback to women for daring to oppose him in several elections. This was personal, sweeties, make no mistake. Thanks for your help NARAL, Planned Parenthood and assorted B0botesses.
Oh, and there was a bit of payoff to these guys for helping install him in the White House
I was writing back then (November 2008)
We already know the gays paid part of the price. I am waiting to see how women will pay the balance.
This is after all, the Year of the Penis.
…


26 comments
March 21, 2010 at 9:46 pm
cj
H.o.l.y. S.h.i.t
March 21, 2010 at 11:29 pm
insightanalytical
Memo to Obots & Obot Bloggers Who Thought Obama Was a Feminist…..We Told You So…Here’s the PROOF!!
http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com/2010/03/21/memo-to-obots-obot-bloggers-who-thought-obama-was-a-feminist-we-told-you-so-heres-the-proof/
So the stupid asshole Bobots can be brought up to speed! All the research I wrote about when Obama was meeting with all the conservative pastors and people who worked with Ken Starr…
March 21, 2010 at 11:35 pm
bluelyon
Yeah, I may need to run another edition of “Down Memory Lane” just to get any residual Obots up-to-speed on his “feminist” creds.
March 22, 2010 at 7:11 am
edgeoforever
Indeed. Updated with my observations based on exit polls – how RW kept the wingnuts home on election day for Obama.
March 21, 2010 at 11:34 pm
bluelyon
What cj said.
March 22, 2010 at 12:03 am
Just to be clear « Blue Lyon
[...] as well as reinforcing the Bush era “conscience” rules. The mind boggles. (H/T: Not Your Sweetie) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)“Sovereign Immunity”ATM AmericansCan [...]
March 22, 2010 at 12:12 am
insightanalytical
I just visited DU…not one thread on this issue!!!!!! Nobody over there seems at all concerned about the abortion game…
I guess that’s the “new liberal”……
March 22, 2010 at 7:12 am
edgeoforever
Check in my update – the thread about hos this EO is a win-win (I guess if you consider men and GOP)
March 22, 2010 at 5:55 am
Tabloids: the “Historical” edition « Not Your Sweetie
[...] Comments insightanalytical on Obama’s EO reinforces W…Just to be clear … on Obama’s EO reinforces W…bluelyon on Obama’s EO [...]
March 22, 2010 at 7:48 am
Pips
Via “michaelwb” at Corrente, Ms. Magazine still gives away posters of the infamous cover, with new subscriptions!
Talk about tone deafness!
March 22, 2010 at 8:05 am
edgeoforever
If they give it, there must be some who grab them.
After all, W was saying “I am a man of peace” to the bitter end.
March 22, 2010 at 10:09 am
Buttered
Let me see if I understand this right. Right before the vote last night…..
Dictator Obama’s pen is out already to sign the EO while he waits for Stupak to vote for the Obama DeathCare Bill.
Right?
March 22, 2010 at 12:23 pm
edgeoforever
Right. WaPo was writing about it yesterday morning when Stupak was still “opposing”
March 22, 2010 at 12:44 pm
Buttered
Thank you.
March 22, 2010 at 10:22 am
Buttered
Along those lines…..
Bart Stupak is the “Segregationist Congressman!”
and Obama’s EO makes Obama the
“Segregationist President!”
http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com/2010/03/21/memo-to-obots-obot-bloggers-who-thought-obama-was-a-feminist-we-told-you-so-heres-the-proof/#comment-8839
Memo to Obots & Obot Bloggers Who Thought Obama Was a Feminist…..We Told You So…Here’s the PROOF!! UPDATE 1X– SEGREGATED!
March 22, 2010 at 12:17 pm
fif
I objected to the bill this morning among a group of high-level Dem activists, and their understanding is that this bill just “maintains the status quo.” Even educated and aware people think that is the truth.
March 22, 2010 at 12:23 pm
edgeoforever
It’s easier that way.
March 22, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Branjor
“Lynn Woolsey and her pro-choice colleagues approve of this potential executive order and think it’s a GOOD thing”
And just what is their rationale as to just *why* this is a “good thing”?
March 22, 2010 at 1:27 pm
edgeoforever
This came via MSNBC, hence it doesn’t have to be true or have a reason. Also, filtered through B0bot mind – so….
March 22, 2010 at 1:32 pm
Branjor
The segregationist president! What a legacy for the first black president! That’s what we ought to call him!
Sorry about my question above – I answered it by re-reading.
April 16, 2010 at 7:40 am
Courts be damned: Obama proclaims Day of Prayer « Not Your Sweetie
[...] culminating nicely with the Jane Crow Executive Order allowing religious hospitals/practitioners to discriminate against women, but protecting THEM from [...]
April 16, 2010 at 8:12 am
Hospital visitation for gay couples- good thing? « Not Your Sweetie
[...] forst of all, this is NOT an executive order. Like say the Jane Crow Executive Order. This is what Obama uses when he wants something to take [...]
April 20, 2010 at 7:44 am
Roe shall twist in the wind yet again in SCOTUS fight « Not Your Sweetie
[...] Remember the good old times when Democratic candidates for POTUS were telling voters that women’s right to chose is as state because of the SCOTUS nominations? I sound very old here – as I doubt Obama made this argument – although his strategists trumpeted on Obama TV that Roe was the “ace in the hole” to bring demeaned back the women he demeaned in the primaries. We know how well this worked for them. [...]
April 30, 2010 at 4:46 pm
Obama scolds the SCOTUS retards « Not Your Sweetie
[...] makes perfect sense from the Jane Crow president – I have to admire the consistency. Even if Obama Times is trying hard to make believe it [...]
July 17, 2010 at 6:37 am
Obama kicks Roe again – Planned parenthood finally notices « Not Your Sweetie
[...] Now the rule is back? Did they sleep through the signing of the Jane Crow EO? [...]
December 9, 2010 at 7:45 am
The Morning Sneeze: Any detail missing from Hyde story? « Not Your Sweetie
[...] Nowhere near is the fact that th Hyde amendment is already enshrined in an executive order, Obama’s Jane Crow EO. [...]