
What made news yesterday was the slashing of CEO’s compensations.
What was newsworthy was that this was a move decided by Obama’s pay czar on his own, without even briefeng the White House on it
But on Wednesday night, administration officials said that the president of the United States didn’t have all that much to do with a decision that will, in many ways, come to define his relationship with Wall Street.
In fact, sources within the administration say the decision to cap corporate pay was Kenneth Feinberg’s, and his alone. A senior administration official tells POLITICO that Obama did not sign off on the pay master’s decision.
Which reminds me of another newsworthy story that barely made news: the much praised decision to set a dateline for closing Guantanamo, was made by the White House Counsel Greg Craig. Since now, even CNN fact checking SNL had to give Guantanamo to them, it is Craig who is being scapegoated.
in the case of the CEO pay slash, we are in the celebration phase, so the pay czar us being used as ammunition in the “war on Fox” – with the White House trying to bar Fox from interviewing him and all the other networks refusing to join in the shunning. Maybe they are now understanding the meaning of the White House reserving the privilege of deciding what’s news and what’s not

In other news, Cheney is at war with the White House on the war with Afghanistan. This is not a pretend war like before Among other things Cheney accuses Obama of taking credit for their plan
“bears a striking resemblance” to the one announced by President Obama in March.
Bush administration handed Obama’s transition team a policy review of the Afghan war conducted last fall to meet the new challenges posed by the Taliban.“They asked us not to announce our findings publicly, and we agreed, giving them the benefit of our work and the benefit of the doubt,” Cheney said.
And it is true that Cheney did praise Obama in March, when stealing their plan
Leaving aside the dithering – not dithering debate, when Gibbs was asked about Cheney’s remarks – and delivered some – deserved attacks, the non-answer on the stolen strategy was interesting
“I have not looked at that review,” Gibbs said. ”I don’t know whether what he describes is accurate.”
oops! Seems that like in the debates, Obama got to say “I agree with what they said”. Only he didn’t, he just pretended he said it.
So, the Nobel peace prize laureate, just stole Cheney’s war! Now, if he only could figure out what to do with it!
Update
Adding a link to Cheney’s statements that still works



14 comments
October 23, 2009 at 9:29 am
jangles
The “openness” of this administration is a hoot and a holler—how they love to keep secrets! They have 0 out there continually talking, talking, talking to distract from the dealing behind all the closed doors. 0 may find out that delegating authority can really bite where it hurts.
Maybe he needs a Cheney War czar. (At least someone who could make a decision.)
October 23, 2009 at 1:31 pm
cj
You know what’s suprising to me? How truly politically inept these jerks are. I knew they were nothing more than dog-whistling hacks after Hill won NH, but now they’re just embarrassing themselves.
Only the O-team could make FOX News & the Bush WH come out smelling like victims.
October 23, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Buttered
100% inept!
Just like Carville’s attempts at book writing.
“40 More Years: How the Democrats Will Rule the Next Generation” his last book effort this past May is Amazon Ranked #224,934…. (H/T to GizmoTX over at HillBuzz blog)
LOL
It appears the Democrats rule like Carville’s book sells.
NOT AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You know Obama is just waiting to impose dictatorship and crown himself emperor of the world!
Did anyone else see that article about how Obama probably did WORK the Nobel Prize Committee to get the no-ball pudtz award?
At first, 3 out of 5 members were against giving him anything. Then they somehow got strong armed into giving it to him.
Hmmmmmm……. Sounds like last year’s un-Democratic caucus meetings in the primairies!
October 23, 2009 at 3:01 pm
cj
Did anyone else see that article about how Obama probably did WORK the Nobel Prize Committee to get the no-ball pudtz award?
No, I didn’t see it! ROFL, what a lame-O.
James Carville is such a friggin’ weirdo, that it’s hard for me not to like him; I just can’t take him seriously enough to buy his books. I just got Taylor Branch’s book on Clinton, though. Can’t wait to start that.
October 23, 2009 at 3:36 pm
FembotsForObama
no, what article was that? I did read about the 3/5 split, and now some of the committee refuses to speak to the press. Can you post it?
October 23, 2009 at 5:48 pm
Buttered
It was a blog editorial I think.
It did link to this article too I remember.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/15/nobel-committee-originally-split-obama/
Nobel committee originally split on Obama
“The report appears to contradict committee Secretary Geir Lundestad’s statement during the announcement that “the committee was unanimous….
A majority of Norwegian Nobel Committee members initially were opposed ……
The paper said several sources confirmed that three of the five members were opposed to Mr. Obama’s receiving the prize. …
The members’ comments appear to be a departure from the committee’s strict rule of not disclosing the nominees, nominators and details of the negotiations for 50 years.”
October 23, 2009 at 5:52 pm
Buttered
Some more good reading related….
The Truth About Obama’s Nobel Prize
Nobel Prize Committee Chair Thorbjørn Jagland is shamelessly seeking the spotlight.
I can see Jagland being ingenuous enough to think the Nobel Prize will help Obama bring Obama-style hope and change to the rest of the world. When the TV2 reporter asked him about a potential domestic backlash against Obama due to the award, Jagland was clueless.
http://reason.com/archives/2009/10/13/the-truth-about-obamas-nobel-p/1
More on Jagland: “This is the man who spoke gushingly about the hope Obama has inspired. Who is Thorbjorn Jagland?
Some stories have reported that he is the former prime minister of Norway, and that he was the leader of the Norwegian Labor Party for 10 years. But he recently completed an even more interesting 10-year tenure.
From 1999 through 2008, Jagland was vice president of Socialist International. What’s that? It’s exactly what the name suggests – an international organization of socialist groups who advocate for far left policies. It also boasts of “consultative status” with the United Nations.”
http://www.thefoxnation.com/international/2009/10/12/who-thorbjorn-jagland-nobel-prize-committee-chairmans-socialist-ties-reveal
October 23, 2009 at 5:54 pm
Buttered
Some more good reading related….
The Truth About Obama’s Nobel Prize
Nobel Prize Committee Chair Thorbjørn Jagland is shamelessly seeking the spotlight.
I can see Jagland being ingenuous enough to think the Nobel Prize will help Obama bring Obama-style hope and change to the rest of the world. When the TV2 reporter asked him about a potential domestic backlash against Obama due to the award, Jagland was clueless.
http://reason.com/archives/2009/10/13/the-truth-about-obamas-nobel-p/1
October 23, 2009 at 5:54 pm
Buttered
More on Jagland: “This is the man who spoke gushingly about the hope Obama has inspired. Who is Thorbjorn Jagland?
Some stories have reported that he is the former prime minister of Norway, and that he was the leader of the Norwegian Labor Party for 10 years. But he recently completed an even more interesting 10-year tenure.
From 1999 through 2008, Jagland was vice president of Socialist International. What’s that? It’s exactly what the name suggests – an international organization of socialist groups who advocate for far left policies. It also boasts of “consultative status” with the United Nations.”
http://www.thefoxnation.com/international/2009/10/12/who-thorbjorn-jagland-nobel-prize-committee-chairmans-socialist-ties-reveal
October 23, 2009 at 1:49 pm
Buttered
You got that right!
Rumor has it they’re adding dozens of new closets (even closets within closets) and hidey-holes all over the White House!
October 23, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Obama personally leads his armies against Fox « Not Your Sweetie
[...] The Jokers: Jr and Jr.jr News and newsworthy: who stole Cheney’s war? [...]
October 26, 2009 at 1:40 am
thetownecrier
“sources within the administration say the decision to cap corporate pay was Kenneth Feinberg’s, and his alone.”
Interesting ability for an official not voted into any office, to have that kind of power over the citizenry.
November 27, 2009 at 10:35 pm
B0bots: We fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here « Not Your Sweetie
[...] On several levels Among other things Cheney accuses Obama of taking credit for their plan “bears a striking resemblance” to the one announced by President Obama in March. [...]
December 1, 2009 at 8:46 am
War propaganda: how Obama media plays with the numbers « Not Your Sweetie
[...] maybe it comes from all the xeroxing they’ve been doing, including stealing the Bush/Cheney war plans “bears a striking resemblance” to the one announced by [...]