
A lot of headlines today seem to put the responsibility for (not) closing Guantanamo and Gitmo on the Democrats in Congress.
Here’s New York Times for instance
Democrats in Senate Block Money to Close Guantánamo
Only in the third paragraph do we find out – in passing, that
In recent days, Mr. Obama has faced growing demands from both parties, but particularly Republicans, to lay out a more detailed road map for closing the Guantánamo prison and to provide assurances that detainees would not end up on American soil, even in maximum security prisons.
And yet, the headlines have Democrats jeopardizing the closing of Guantanamo that Obama so wanted (that would be the same Obama who wants to keep some prisoners and have military tribunals)
Of course, now he appears like the good guy who tried, but the bad Democrats in Congress wouldn’t let him.
Here’s WaPo pushing this narrative
U.S. Senate Democrats on Tuesday moved to cut $80 million earmarked for closing the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, a fresh setback for President Barack Obama’s efforts to move beyond the Bush administration’s anti-terror policies.
Only Dick Durbin apparently let the cat out of the bag
Did the administration put Democrats in an awkward position, asking for the money before setting out how it would be spent?
“Not at all,” said Reid.
“Yes,” his deputy, Sen. Dick Durbin replied to the same question.
Oops! It’s a good thing this nugget of information is wedged in a collection of 3 botched Reid statements with the one on Ted Kennedy’s health bound to catch the public’s attention.
here’s Durbin from the WaPo account:
“The feeling was at this point we were defending the unknown. We were being asked to defend a plan that hasn’t been announced,” said Richard Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat.
This is a symptomatic one for the way Obama operates: he is the one reading the lofty speeches – the peons have to sweat working out the policy details. Whatever happened to teamwork?

Other than the introduction of TOTUS in the equation, is pretty much back to Jr times.
And, by throwing the democrats in Congress under the bus, some interesting shifts may occur next election – for all the reports of death of the GOP.
One more thing: Obama knows that he has the complicity of the media in this and knows exactly what he is doing. I am reminded of what he told bankers he met with prior to the bailout
The public isn’t buying that.” (i.e: my media won’t let them)
“My administration,” the president added, “is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.”
To which, I thought at the time: or, depending on the perspective, it was the bankers standing between the pitchforks and Obama. But the public needs to once again, look past the media noise…
Update
Marc Ambinder who has always been the voice of the Obama spinsters, comes with the latest:
Was it a setback? Only apparently. Obana reallt shrewdly played everyone
The shrewdness of Obama’s executive order on day two cannot be denied, nor can its targeted audience – European and Arab governments, and the broader world – be ignored in the current debate. Gitmo was a “rallying cry” for Al Qaeda – that line’s for public consumption – and for anti-Americanism abroad, for European smugness, for exasperation with America by Moslems everywhere.
Once we “fooled those people, we can go on with business as usual
The plain truth is that the administration fully expects to hold a number of detainees in indefinite custody within the United States. (Ironically, had Guantanamo not become a lightning rod for the world, it might have been the perfect place to build long-term detention facilities.)
See? And Congress takes the fall. Brilliant!


18 comments
May 20, 2009 at 7:05 am
Grail Guardian
It’s been very obvious that the Democrats are going to push through anything that they want with little to no resistance from Republicans. If the Dems aren’t closing Gitmo, it’s simply because they want it open.
May 20, 2009 at 7:39 am
edgeoforever
That’s my point: It is Obama who really doesn’t want them closed. I am not saying the Democrats in Congress are offering a lot of resistance, but someone like say, Durbin, probably would have. As it is, they are backed into a corner and then demonized for it by the media.
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 am
Mrs. Bucket
One could almost believe Obama wants to import terrorists onto American soil.
May 20, 2009 at 7:24 am
myiq2xu
Whose side are the Democrats on?
May 20, 2009 at 7:37 am
edgeoforever
Not ours, the voters, that’s for sure.
May 20, 2009 at 8:26 am
angienc2
Exactly right Edge — Obama is using the Dems in Congress for “cover” — just like with that cram down provision that failed (remember the thing that would have really helped homeowners & the economy — don’t hear that mentioned too much in the press). Why the Dems are so stupid to allow this is the $20,000 question.
May 20, 2009 at 10:03 am
cj
“The feeling was at this point we were defending the unknown. We were being asked to defend a plan that hasn’t been announced,” said Richard Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat.”
They’re politicians & they damned well know that he’s using them for cover; the question is, how hard will they fight him the next time?
May 20, 2009 at 10:31 am
morninmist
Well, I think in many respects the WH did leave the Dems out to dry in the sense of Obama just wanted the money with no details on how to close Gitmo.
It left a big hole for the Dems to try to defend.
Now The Hill says BO will give a speech tomorrow on nat. security –will he provide details?
In the end it seems the cart was placed before the horse.
May 20, 2009 at 5:24 pm
leslie
This man seems to live to give speeches. Well, I am deaf as far as ThatOne is concerned. I can’t and won’t listen to Jr.jr anymore than I will listen to Jr.
The campaign continues…………….
May 20, 2009 at 11:48 am
Mrs. Bucket
Hey Un-Democratic Party in Congress!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a real pain when your organizational body has to operate WITHOUT A HEAD!
“Obama – The Headless Horseman!”
May 20, 2009 at 12:56 pm
cj
Yep, the Un-Democratic Party in Congress.
And they KNEW how the jerk operated as a senator, (even John McCain made a point of saying that he’d never work with him again) and yet the Dems couldn’t wait to jump on the O-bus as it ran over Hillary!
And now they’re shocked, positively shocked that the same O-bus just ran over them.
May 20, 2009 at 2:48 pm
morninmist
I do not think they wanted to know–they looked the other way and the media –except for fox seldom reported any negatives (as we know).
May 20, 2009 at 6:55 pm
What’s on the blogs? Open Thread « The Widdershins
[...] Edge is wondering where Dems stand on Gitmo. [...]
May 20, 2009 at 7:27 pm
NYSmike
The MSM blames all actions of concern on congress or the senate and all successes through their eyes specifically point toward Obama.
May 20, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Grail Guardian
Yep. And they are equally guilty.
May 20, 2009 at 8:56 pm
Woman Voter
The cartoon is priceless.
June 9, 2009 at 5:38 am
Obama at the hands of…anti-war liberals? « Not Your Sweetie
[...] Huffpo, the lie that Obama wanted to close Gitmo, Guntanamo but Congress stopped him is repeated here again. I suppose after Lieberman’s fight against the torture photos, [...]
June 10, 2009 at 7:01 am
Vile misogyny still OK when it’s Palin; covering for torturers « Not Your Sweetie
[...] No matter what happens to this bill, these words need to be remembered, especially Obama’s support wich is bound to be thrown down memory hole along with his unwillingness to close Guantanamo and Gitmo. [...]