h/t to Garrychapelhill
Even since Murdoch bought AP, their style and credibility became tabloidish.
In this election cycle, AP was Murdoch’s main outlet of holdining his promised agreement with the Obama campaign (Fox, NY Post ans Wall Street journal would have to appear more ambiguous in their shilling – or as he likes to say “fair and balanced”.
But AP, which feeds news to most major newspapers in the country, went all out.
There re several memorable lies:
The last primary in Puerto Rico was expected to go to Hillary and also to put her over the top in the popular vote. So, in order to create voter supppression, AP falsely announced not once, but 3 times that day that Hillary dropped out.
After the VP debate, AP scrubbed its own realistic account about Palin’s victory wish a propagandistic storry shilling for Obama.
They also blackmailed McCain that they would paint him as a racist if he dares bring out Ayres.
And now, after the election, when Obama’s collusion with the fundies was made obvious by the passing of Proposition 8, AP is trying to fudge the facts.
They mix in some true facts
Leaders of the successful Proposition 8 campaign say an unusual coalition of evangelical Christians, Mormons and Roman Catholics built a majority at the polls Tuesday by harnessing the organizational muscle of churches to a mainstream message about what school children might be taught about gay relationships if the ban failed.
gloss over others
Mormons make up less than 2 percent of the California population with a religious preference,
bury the lede
Exit polls showed 70 percent of blacks supported the ban, a far higher percentage than any other race.
and go out of their way to insulate Obama from any responsibility
During his campaign for the White House, Obama pledged to work for repeal of the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act, which prevents the federal government from affording Social Security and other benefits to same-sex couples. He also vowed to reverse the Defense Department policy that prevents openly gay people from serving in the military.
I personally don’t remember those promises, but I’ll be sure to keep them in mind now.
And here’s what the AP article did miss:
Exit numbers suggest the fundies stayed home election Day
The Obama campaign allowed Obama’s voice to be used in robocalls saying Obama opposed gay marriage.
B0bots were not told to vote against it. They did vote for a proposition taking care of chickens. left the gays out – as price for the Christian right staying home.
So, nice try misdirections AP. The Mormons may have raised 36 million, but Obama’s 600 million could have easily wiped that out, had not the agreement been in place.
As Garry says – now morons are protesting Mormons…
Politico allows a bit of truth to peek in
One of the few notable losses for the left on Tuesday came in California, where Proposition 8, which “Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry,” passed by a bit more than three percentage points, even as — or perhaps because — Barack Obama won the state by a whopping 24 points.
Fallout over the apparent black-gay split within the Democratic coalition has been fierce, with Dan Savage claiming black homophobia, reports of racial slurs and abuse directed at blacks at a marriage equality rally on Thursday, and Andrew Sullivan, among others, calling for calm.
Wait, Andrew Sullivan calling for calm?

And who’s gonna monitor baby Trig sonogram now????
And a heavily ironical closing
It’s one early sign of the diverse and sometimes divergent interests of members of the party base Obama will have to choose amongst and navigate between as president.
Will have to? You mean, what happened in November didn’t give anyone an inkling of a choice already made????



15 comments
November 9, 2008 at 7:14 am
Grail Guardian
I started loathing AP after the fiasco announcing Hillary’s withdrawal from the race. It’s quite obvious that we cannot trust a word they say, and since all the MSM get their news from AP, well you do the math!
November 9, 2008 at 7:52 am
Glennmcgahee
The sorry state of affairs is that we hear their “news” repeated by regular people almost word for word daily. It does not matter what media you use, print, TV, radio. Everybody has scapped their newsrooms with budget cuts and they all lazily diseminate the info spoon fed to them by sources like the AP. Unless we destroy this media, we are doomed to repeat the same mistakes. People do not have time to search out information, we have to depend on media. Its time to hold the FCC’s feet to the fire and restore anti-monopoly policies on media in certain markets. Its mind control, plain and simple.
November 9, 2008 at 8:17 am
Grail Guardian
Its mind control, plain and simple.
Well said!
November 9, 2008 at 8:18 am
morebs
The AP lost credibility with me when they wrote the story entitled “Palin’s words carry racial tinge.” FYI AP; Bringing up Bill Ayers isn’t being a racist, Bill Ayers is white.
AP in the tank for Obama.
November 9, 2008 at 8:28 am
edgeoforever
Glennmcgahee
We cannot “destroy” the propaganda machine. It will however render itself irrelevant by the one sidedness of their stories. It happened during W, just as they were bragging about manufacturing reality. It will happen again. It’s why it’s important that we continue telling the truth – for a time more will seek it.
November 9, 2008 at 9:19 am
Grail Guardian
Edge,
The media needs viewers/readers/listeners to exist. We can destroy the messenger (if not the message) by tuning out and not buying print media. It’s quite simple to do, but the question is this: Do we have the backbone to do it? Can we set aside our lazy habits and do what’s right for this country?
Answer: Probably not. At least without an alternative for people to “tune in” to. We need someone like Lady Lynn Forrester de Rothschild to step up to the plate and start a new TV news channel that actually carries news.
November 9, 2008 at 9:27 am
chimera
I didn’t know about the robocalls. Obama is a menace. One of my friends emailed me after the election celebrating and said, “See, he mentioned gays in the acceptance speech. He doesn’t hate gay people.” Right, he’s just smarter than Hitler. This way he can get gay people to support him and then do away with them.
November 9, 2008 at 10:48 am
warrior princess
Three months ago I started trying to tell people, on this site and others, that there was no way BO would support gay rights battles while he was courting the black vote, regardless of what personal perdjudice he might have.
I spent twenty years in political activism for women’s and gay rights, and there was never a picket line that blacks didn’t corss in a concerted effort, and never a protest they didn’t take the othe side on.
Black America has always, and still does, have a problem with Gay America. Part of that is the “better than” complex. They want to be better than someone, and we, gays, are it. It isn’t something they will give up easily.
The other problem is that Balck America is deeply enjoined to their community churches. With good reason, these are the organizations that kept them alive and kicking for decades through horrendous social and political times, but… those churches are fairly fundamental in outlook,and view gays as despicable and flawed.
Gays and Women have fought for racial equality since there was a fight, but it has never been the other way around. While I have never advocated treated any group as less then equal, it is time for gays and women to get their heads out of the sand and realize that this fight is on us, and us alone. If you keep thinking that there is some loving coalition just waiting to come to our adi, we will always be back here in the shadows waiting for a chance to join the human race on an equal footing, and it will never come.
November 9, 2008 at 12:01 pm
edgeoforever
Warrior Princess:
Bravo! Bravo! Stand up ovation! Probably the most important lesson to come out of this year’s shenanigans:
November 9, 2008 at 12:17 pm
Grail Guardian
Agreed!
November 9, 2008 at 3:17 pm
alice
I’m very curious: if stripping away civil rights is so important to BO (as it seems to be in Obotia’s convenient fantasies), why hasn’t he taken strong, public leadership on the issue? He’s had opportunities to speak up about ballot measures like Prop 8 since its passage. Yet, he hasn’t provided any strong leadership on it.
Hmmm, you’d almost think dear leader didn’t care about the LGBT communities…
November 10, 2008 at 11:16 am
Dum De Dum Dum
…..
I want lesbian Donna Brazile’s opinion about Prop. 8.
She needs to be put on the spot – and forced to make her opinions and intentions about it known.
Hold lesbian Donna Brazile accountable!
January 4, 2009 at 6:18 am
AP: shilling for Obama, shilling for Bush « Not Your Sweetie
[...] we have during this elections giving us a AP, one of the most notorious shills for Obamaridiculous fluff piece about Bush. Click here to add text Click here to add [...]
August 3, 2009 at 8:56 am
WaPo: Obama is anti-gay marriage, so there! (and we still hate Clinton!) « Not Your Sweetie
[...] WE TOLD YOU SO! [...]
April 16, 2010 at 7:40 am
Courts be damned: Obama proclaims Day of Prayer « Not Your Sweetie
[...] Before the election Obama did nothing to convince his voters in California to vote against proposition 8 [...]