I saw those words in the Oborg Saturdy night. Apparently they had already gone to their media surrogates as Politico reports – Andrea Mitchel was parotting them
: “The Obama people must feel that he didn’t do quite as well as they might have wanted to in that context, because what they are putting out privately is that McCain may not have been in the cone of silence and may have had some ability to overhear what the questions were to Obama. He seemed so well-prepared.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 8/17/08)
Of course, whenever someone outshines Obama there are sinister reasons afoot. We all remember how the anchors of ABC debate – who were hitting on both Hillary and Obama were universally chastised – because Obama was not able to answer as well as Hillary.Here’s Sowell:
There was outrage in the mainstream media when ABC anchorman Charles Gibson asked Obama a serious question about the economic effects of a capital gains tax. Who interrupts honeymooners to talk economics?
The fact that Obama did not have a very coherent answer made things worse — for Gibson. Since Obama can do no wrong in the eyes of many of his supporters, they resented Gibson’s having asked him such a question.
This time, McCain who is somewhat less in disfavor with the media than Hillary was, complained about it in a letter to the president of NBC News
We are extremely disappointed to see that the level of objectivity at NBC News has fallen so low that reporters are now giving voice to unsubstantiated, partisan claims in order to undercut John McCain.
Make no mistake: This is a serious charge. Andrea Mitchell is repeating, uncritically, a completely unsubstantiated Obama campaign claim that John McCain somehow cheated in last night’s forum at Saddleback Church.
Indeed, instead of taking a critical journalistic approach to this spin, Andrea Mitchell did what has become a pattern for her of simply repeating Obama campaign talking points.
McCain campaign also quotes Obama in th forum having said:
Barack Obama acknowledged during the forum when asked about Pastor Warren’s idea of an emergency plan for orphans and Obama said, “I cheated a little bit. I actually looked at this idea ahead of time, and I think it is a great idea;”
As usual – projection. As for Mitchell? Her defense:
“I wasn’t expressing an opinion,” Mitchell said. “I was reporting what they were saying.”
Too bad, that “they” are always one and the same side. It was Russert’s tecnique – when confronting guests with the most outlandish poorly sourced contentions. It’s been consistently used for the past 8 yers to prop the Bush administration. Now it’s the turn of Jr.jr
Bush’s other sycophants, NY Times – they of Judith Miller credibility is repeating the accusation
CNN actually bothers too check the facts
Warren told CNN Sunday evening, “we flat out asked him” if he heard any of the questions. The McCain campaign “confirmed that McCain did not hear or see any of the broadcast” in the motorcade or after he arrived, Ross said.
When asked if McCain overheard anything, Charlie Black, a McCain adviser who was with him at the time, told CNN: “We were in motorcade until 5:30 p.m. ET; then a holding room in another building with no TV.”
I have covered this that very night when it was merely something floating on an obot board. I didn’t imagine that the media – which was then complimentary to mcCain will go “they say” on us.
What they are doing though, it surpasses attacking george Staphanopoulis from ABC. Now they are saying a man of cloth is lying and contributing to a cheat. I wonder how well will this go over with that audience Obama was so desperate to please? What would reverend Wright do?
Update in a slightly related news – Obama met and praised an actual swiftboater
RENO, Nev. — Barack Obama on Sunday met with — and defended — one of the primary financers of the group that was perhaps most responsible for sinking Sen. John F. Kerry’s 2004 presidential bid.
Obama was asked how it felt to be meeting with the man “who tore down” Kerry’s campaign.:
“Ah, you know, he’s got a lot longer track record than that,” Obama said. “He’s been doing, ah, he’s a legendary entrepreneur and you know, one of the things that I think we have to unify the country around is having an intelligent energy policy.”
In addition to his contributions to Swift Boat Veterans, Pickens gave $2.5 million to the Karl Rove-linked 527 group Progress for America and also has been a major bundler for Republican candidates.



22 comments
August 18, 2008 at 3:15 am
candymarl
Judith Miller? She of the Iraq war lies? There’s a journalist you can trust. NOT.
August 18, 2008 at 3:16 am
candymarl
Not to over post but when you have to trot out Judith Miller of all people, you’re desperate.
August 18, 2008 at 3:20 am
Findalis
Obama cannot speak well without the teleprompter. McCain will clobber him in any debate. Obama missed his target on Saturday. The target was the Evangelicals and he missed it by a mile.
August 18, 2008 at 3:29 am
Fredster
Mrs. Greenspan sez she’s just reporting…
Seems a “reporter” would want to ask those Obie talking heads “what makes you think that?”
So it seems that Mrs. Mitchell is not a reporter per se, but merely a messenger for the Obama campaign. If she’s merely repeating what they say, then she’s not really a journalist but just plays one on teevee.
August 18, 2008 at 3:42 am
edgeoforever
To me, New York Times is the Judith Miller paper – because it’s what they did when it mattered. I could name Bob Herbert and his Tower of Pisa & other strange fallic symbols or Maureen Dowd and her Darcy to remind people how low NYT descended as of late.
August 18, 2008 at 3:44 am
Pandering to the fundies - with the review « Not Your Sweetie
[...] *see how the Obama surrogates in the media embraced that one Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)And the Reagan worship goes on!Is Obama being compared to Reagan a Double Entendre?LATEST CAMPAIGNS ADSJames Dobson Has no Love for Barack Obama [...]
August 18, 2008 at 6:36 am
Perry Logan
Then again, Obama would know all about cheating.
August 18, 2008 at 9:08 am
notfollowingthpiedpiper
Yet another example for those blind enough to still deny media bias:
Compare theses two articles on Time (official obama campaign mag.)site-saddleback forum scorecard:
http://thepage.time.com/halperins-saddleback-forum-scorecard-mccain/
http://thepage.time.com/halperins-saddleback-forum-scorecard-obama/
Compare the photos used-camera angle on BO to make him look as hopeychangey as possible. Standing tall and smiling that well rehearsed smile. McCain sitting behind desk, getting make-up to subliminally imply that his age must be covered.
The ONE statement which began by, vaguely implied criticism on the BO page ended up being countered with positive OPINION: “Maybe a bit too flip and colloquial at times (he said “screw up” twice), but fluid, good natured, and unflappable at almost every moment.” An errant opinion at best. They actually tried to pass off, “…He effectively stalled with verbal filler… ” as a compliment, instead of calling it what it was —STUTTERING AND UHHHHHM, STAMMERING!
The McCain page opens with “…Made a more emphatic electoral APPEAL than Obama did, OFFERING HIMSELF UP…” implying he is in the position of begging for votes.
More negative OPINIONS: “Not as optimistic as Obama”‘ , “…jokes, which the audience ate up, even the ancient ones…”, …UNUSUALLY passionate and articulate…”
Those who actually watched this religious dog and pony show probably came away with with a much different opinion…like McCain OWNED IT!
August 18, 2008 at 9:08 am
insightanalytical
Obama is a spoiled brat being protected by his caretakers! He is a WIMP!!!!
In the meantime, while Howard Dean “did a jackass proud” with his comments on NPR radio… embarrassing himself, not only with the race card, but with his telling aside about “even women,” Moyers did an interview which has been reviewed by kenoshaMarge. Prof. Andrew J Bacevich really was great talking about his new book, THE LIMITS OF POWER: THE END OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM.
A Tiny Light in the Darkness…(Prof. Andrew J. Bacevich on Moyers, 8/15))
http://tinyurl.com/6s9e7m
http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com
August 18, 2008 at 10:27 am
lachattefolle
Andrea Mitchell is just one of the many reasons I no longer bother to watch MSNothingButObama. “Some people say” is a cop out and to then claim all you are doing is reporting what “they” say is lazy journalism at best and all out propagandizing for Obama at worst. I’m glad McCain called her out on her bullshit and I hope he does so every time the media gets in the hot tub with Obama.
He might have to hire extra staff to keep those letters cranked out though, since the media can’t seem to shake their puppy love of teh Precious.
August 18, 2008 at 11:27 am
Jane D
Talk about more of the same. There seems to be such a consistent pattern in the Obama campaign: every single time Obama takes a hit or underperforms, they blame someone else or something else. Racism! Cheating! Dirty politics! They’re picking on me! Whatever.
I am SO over Obama and his empty meaningless words. The reason McCain blew his socks off Saturday night was because McCain had 30+ years of experience from which to draw. The questions were all softball questions, and anyone with solid experience, firm convictions and the confidence to know what he stands for could have answered them as well as McCain did upside down.
Obama fell flat on his face because he has ZERO experience, ZERO conviction and the man has NO OPINION. His opinion seems to be everyone’s opinion, and that is not what I want in a president.
August 18, 2008 at 12:51 pm
jon
Funny stuff.
Was McCain in the building, when Obama’s interview started?
Did the McCain Campaign know the Rules beforehand?
Did they know the time the event started?
Are you saying if the situation were reversed, and Obama wasn’t in the building, when McCain’s interview started, that you wouldn’t be questioning Obama’s motives?
The hypocrisy is mind-boggling!
August 18, 2008 at 1:50 pm
okasha skatsi
Now me, I think Obama can fall on his face quite honestly. He doesn’t have to resort to cheating to do that.
August 18, 2008 at 2:03 pm
papau
Once it is official that Hillary is not the VP nominee, the current 44% polling for Obama will fall away into 30′s – it is going to be a blow out for the GOP in a year that should have been a blowout for the Democratic Party.
August 18, 2008 at 2:27 pm
okasha skatsi
Obama really is the Second Coming–of George McGovern.
August 18, 2008 at 2:40 pm
MODERATE
I am not a huge Obama fan, actually, I am leaning toward McCain at the moment. But does it seem fair that the audience was at least 70% Republicans? Bush got over 70% of the evangelical vote. Will McCain and Obam debate in an arena filled with 70% Democrats? Probably not. There were no surprises what so ever in the debate. Boring and uninformative. Maybe it helped counter act the mainstream media’s facination with Obama. WHich, by the way, would be reporting on McCain if they could make as much money off of him. Advertizers are for Obama as much as the media heads.
THese candidates need to be courting people such as myself, the undecided voters.
We want to know how they are going to implement their big ideas. Neither side is doing so well at this.
An American
August 18, 2008 at 3:30 pm
nancy
PLEASE CONTACT ALL HILLARY’S PLEGED DELEGATES IN YOUR STATE. Make sure they are voting for Hillary in the convention. Voters in your district have voted for them to represent the people at your district.
Here is the link for all the Certified Delegates By State :
http://www.demconvention.com/certified-delegates-ec/
August 18, 2008 at 3:51 pm
Texas Hill Country
hmmm… Andrea Mitchell is famous for her “unnamed sources” and it’s about time someone called her out on that stuff…. she said some outlandish and brutal stuff about Hillary in the primaries. It was ridiculous.
And I don’t really mind the thing about Pickens though… he is going t be a major force in the field of alternative energy and democrats are going to have to work with him if we want to get this stuff up and running asap.
jmho though
August 18, 2008 at 6:54 pm
jenniforhillary
McCain made Obama look like Mr. BlahBlah. Isn’t hard to do really, just put any thinking human being with an IQ over 50 near him who is HONEST and they will put him to shame.
Mr. Obama is not smart enough to lie well, and I find his talkabouts tiresome and indicative of some real evil. Unlike Mr. Obama, I know real evil and his name is Barrack Hussein Obama. His other name is the DNC.
Hillary Clinton for President NOW. Anyone interested in fighting fascism, sexism, racism and stupidity go to http://www.blog.pumapac.org.
August 18, 2008 at 7:08 pm
ipotter
Perhaps bo needs another vacation. I for one, would like him to just go away, and wish Fitzgerald would do the honors.
August 19, 2008 at 8:10 pm
Poll:Voters discover the value of experience « Not Your Sweetie
[...] Obama did badly? They cheeeeated!!!!!!8.18 [...]
August 19, 2008 at 11:59 pm
CKA in Red State USA
Barack Obama, or Barry Soetoro, or whatever his real name might be, is a wimpering pansy.
He can’t even impersonate a man, but hides behind lies, excuses and the skirts of his shills and shillettes in the wrongly named MSM.
The dictators and tyrants of the world–Putin included–must be salivating at the prospect of Obama even being nominated. By that guage alone, the decay of the U.S. can be measured and found to be great.
Honestly, what a sissy, a whining little child who’s so far out of his league it actually isn’t funny.